Location: Mythological Films. The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

Discussion: most and leastThis is a featured thread

Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6  | Next > Last

SupBigNose
20. RE: most and least
Jul 16 2009, 7:55 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 16 2009, 7:55 PM EDT
no no... I believe if nine year olds made the movies they might be good...

(I havent seen the new harry Pothead so I dunno about it)
Do you find this valuable?    

onyxpearl
21. RE: most and least
Jul 16 2009, 10:31 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 16 2009, 10:31 PM EDT
or possibly if they weren't made by corrupt, money-grubbing whores....
Do you find this valuable?    

SupBigNose
22. RE: most and least
Jul 17 2009, 6:21 AM EDT | Post edited: Jul 17 2009, 6:21 AM EDT
They should be made by true fans... The people who make half the comic movies probably never opened a comic in their lives...
Do you find this valuable?    
freedragon10022
freedragon10022
23. RE: most and least
Jul 17 2009, 8:47 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 17 2009, 8:47 PM EDT
but then out of those true fans how many actually know how to direct a film?
Do you find this valuable?    
freedragon10022
freedragon10022
24. RE: most and least
Jul 17 2009, 8:47 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 17 2009, 8:47 PM EDT
Not to mention acting.
Do you find this valuable?    

SupBigNose
25. RE: most and least
Jul 18 2009, 7:05 AM EDT | Post edited: Jul 18 2009, 7:05 AM EDT
Acting has nothing to do with it... Actors don't write the script... Its the Script writers that need to be fans mostly...
Do you find this valuable?    

onyxpearl
26. RE: most and least
Jul 18 2009, 11:31 AM EDT | Post edited: Jul 18 2009, 11:31 AM EDT
epiphany!
Do you find this valuable?    
freedragon10022
freedragon10022
27. RE: most and least
Jul 18 2009, 1:10 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 18 2009, 1:10 PM EDT
kay. how many know were to get the people that know how to do the stuff? the acting, the lighting, thecomputer effects, the explossions, technitians, etc?
Do you find this valuable?    

stonepony83
28. RE: most and least
Jul 18 2009, 1:36 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 18 2009, 1:36 PM EDT
Well, the main thing is, is that the people who do take a story line and destory it by Hollywoodnising it, don't really destroy the true work. You always have the original that you can go back to. Like Jumper, Harry Potter, Dragon Ball Z, Transformers, X-Men, etc., those stories are never destoryed or corrupted (unless the author screws it up themselves or sells out). It will always be there, as we remember it to truely be.

I can't stand movies that are way too out of the original plot, example: Harry Potter and X-men. My main beef with X-Men was Rouge. In the storyline, she just wasn't the southern bell Rouge who had absorbed Ms. Marvels powers like I remembered in the older comics.
Do you find this valuable?    
freedragon10022
freedragon10022
29. RE: most and least
Jul 18 2009, 1:39 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 18 2009, 1:39 PM EDT
ah. nice to have you back.
Do you find this valuable?    

stonepony83
30. RE: most and least
Jul 18 2009, 1:42 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 18 2009, 1:42 PM EDT
I'll be peeking in every once in a while. I just now managed to finagle it around so I could use a computer for a little while and get online.

I'm glad to see that someone missed me though! ;p
Do you find this valuable?    
freedragon10022
freedragon10022
31. RE: most and least
Jul 18 2009, 1:43 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 18 2009, 1:43 PM EDT
I was considering searching for you yes.
Do you find this valuable?    

SupBigNose
32. RE: most and least
Jul 18 2009, 2:40 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 18 2009, 2:40 PM EDT
Ah, but sometimes the write is NOT the author... he/she just sells the rights...
Do you find this valuable?    

Mystic-Apotamkin
33. RE: most and least
Jul 19 2009, 1:37 AM EDT | Post edited: Jul 19 2009, 1:37 AM EDT
I hate watching a movie that is different to the book too but, in some cases i can see why they do it.

Take the latest Harry Potter movie for instance, yes they burnt down the burrow which didn't occur in the book, but to get all the imformation thats in the book in to a film, exactly how it was originaly written, is almost impossible, the movie would be 5 hours long.
So they either create a scene or change the story line a little to get the same message across...

Refering back to the Harry Potter movie, in the book it was all about people fear of Voldemorts return, and about the death eaters causing terror amoung the the magical community.. If you cant get it all into a movie, but want to creat the same fear in the audience as the book does for its readers, it's a better idea to create a scene like the burning of the burrow to ultimatly get the same effect, rather than have a 5 hour movie and lose peoples attention..

It irrates the true fans yes, but the general audience wouldn't know the difference.
Do you find this valuable?    

SupBigNose
34. RE: most and least
Jul 19 2009, 3:23 AM EDT | Post edited: Jul 19 2009, 3:24 AM EDT
fear in the audience ... I wasn't aware it caused me fear :P...

have you guys seen the 'Watchmen'? THAT was 95% true to the graphic novel... Nothing MAJOR was taken out... only slight changes were made to make it applicable for a movie... that was ok... cos the important aspects of the novel were still there...

If they make a book/comic/game to movie... they have to get ALL the important aspects of it, all the important events in it... WHICH THEY DON'T USUALLY... and... they can remove scenes which make little difference... or shorten the conversation before they start changing...

Watchmen was three hours long and LotR of four... so time should not be an issue...

Oh and... welcome back...
Do you find this valuable?    

Mystic-Apotamkin
35. RE: most and least
Jul 19 2009, 3:30 AM EDT | Post edited: Jul 19 2009, 3:30 AM EDT
"fear in the audience ... I wasn't aware it caused me fear :P...

"
Yeah okay, wrong choice of words, but you know what i was getting at smarty pants..

And you must have really missed me to welcome me back twice :P
Do you find this valuable?    

SupBigNose
36. RE: most and least
Jul 19 2009, 7:45 AM EDT | Post edited: Jul 19 2009, 7:45 AM EDT
Course, we missed you...

This place was becoming too much of a sausage fest...
Do you find this valuable?    

Anonymous
37. RE: most and least
Jul 19 2009, 10:23 AM EDT | Post edited: Jul 19 2009, 10:23 AM EDT
How come I don't such warm welcomes when I make my return debute?

Also I don't really agree with this page because isn't it really just one's opinion? A person may find a film that he conceives as crap: e.g Twilight; while others may enjoy it. Or vice versa naturally.
Do you find this valuable?    
Dous777
Dous777
38. RE: most and least
Jul 19 2009, 12:16 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 19 2009, 12:16 PM EDT
I'm going to assume the anon is somebody that we know - I happen to agree with the page.
I did, however, just watch an awful, awful movie, 'Thor - The hammer of the gods'. Which pretty much hit all the major movie mistakes (bad acting, bad plot, change in enemy strength towards the end, unbelievable reasoning) except having technology appear where it shouldn't have (Though I wouldn't be surprised if one of the Norsemen were wearing a watch).
And the werewolves in it, yes werewolves, were fair enough half th time but other times people just ran passed the shot with paper mache wolf heads... And I swear it skipped a bit in the middle!!!
Did I mention the movie was only made this year?
Do you find this valuable?    

AVMidian
39. RE: most and least
Jul 19 2009, 2:04 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 19 2009, 2:04 PM EDT
Dous that sounds horrible. What compelled you to watch such a movie?
Do you find this valuable?    
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6  | Next > Last