Sign in or
Location: Rods
Discussion: This has already been disproven.
Category:
Discussion Forum /
General Discussion
Showing 4 posts
Posted Anonymously |
This has already been disproven.
May 1 2011, 12:04 PM EDT
I don't remember the show that did it, but these are just things like bugs or birds, or even bats that just move very quickly, and when captured in a photograph, create a blur, hence the illusion of the rod.
11
out of
26 found this valuable.
Do you?
Keyword tags:
invisable to the naked eye
|
Posted Anonymously |
1. RE: This has already been disproven.
Nov 1 2012, 11:26 PM EDT
the show was paranormal files, fact or fake. on the syfy channel.
0
out of
2 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
Dean_Colt |
2. RE: This has already been disproven.
Dec 25 2016, 11:34 PM EST
It's easy for disbelievers to say it's been disproven when all they've seen are a bunch of TV shows rigged to "disprove" unexplained phenomena as "something normally occurring but we don't know much about," or as most ignorant so-called "scientists" do to "explain away" anything they don't understand or refuse to acknowledge they don't know anything about. So yeah, go ahead and "disprove" all you like, but I've seen enough unexplained phenomena to know that these things exist, and science and human knowledge have no way of explaining these phenomena...
Do you find this valuable?
|
__Desiree__ |
3. RE: This has already been disproven.
Dec 30 2016, 5:20 AM EST
"It's easy for disbelievers to say it's been disproven when all they've seen are a bunch of TV shows rigged to "disprove" unexplained phenomena as "something normally occurring but we don't know much about," or as most ignorant so-called "scientists" do to "explain away" anything they don't understand or refuse to acknowledge they don't know anything about. So yeah, go ahead and "disprove" all you like, but I've seen enough unexplained phenomena to know that these things exist, and science and human knowledge have no way of explaining these phenomena..."I dunno, Dean. I doubt this persons gonna reply. They posted that statement way back on May 1 2011..! Still, I'm with you, on this point. Do you find this valuable? |