Sign in or 
Share this
Showing 7 posts
|
Posted Anonymously |
|
Dous777 |
1. RE: wrong.
Dec 10 2010, 6:35 AM EST
If you would care to outline the differences of these two infused legends then maybe you would have cause to complain. Stating a surface observation, that is well known, solves nothing.
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
xXDuskXx |
2. RE: wrong.
Jan 6 2011, 7:34 PM EST
The differance is that for one a cockatrice is part basilisk and part chicken, and I have never heared of a cockatrice petrifying a person with one glance in any story
3
out of
4 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
basiliskking |
3. RE: wrong.
Apr 24 2011, 10:00 AM EDT
i have heard of one petrifying someone soppossibly in 1681
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
Posted Anonymously |
4. RE: wrong.
Apr 30 2011, 5:11 PM EDT
I believe that the difference between a cockatrice and a basilisk is the same difference between a tigon and a liger, it depends on which animal the "mother" is. I do not recall which one is which, sadly.
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
redman433 |
5. RE: wrong.
May 1 2011, 10:54 AM EDT
true they both turn people to stone though
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
Posted Anonymously |
6. RE: wrong.
May 21 2011, 5:58 PM EDT
Wow. It doesn't matter which is the mom & which is the dad. It'll be the same thing eaither way! They are related, but one is mixed with something alittle different. That is the only difference. =^_^=
Do you find this valuable?
|
